*slaps top of one-page dnd rules i just finished* this bad boy can fit so many house rules lifted entirely from other people's blogs

spilled baked beans all over myself while watching antigone at the ampitheatre and a pythagorean shouted "this citizen eatin beans!" and everyone laughed

however, make no mistake the pythagoreans were a deeply weird cult who hated beans more than they loved life. but they should be mocked for that, not the irrational number thing.

Show thread

of course, the theory of the real numbers hand countless named and nameless contributors besides these. it is the bedrock of most modern mathematics, and it is from a firm position on that bedrock that we look back, see people raising hell because the ground beneath their feet is giving way, and laugh.

Show thread

the other piece is the development of abstract algebra, which provided the tools to understand how the behavior of the positive and negative whole numbers is a certain self-consistent piece of the behavior of the real numbers as a whole. for this we have to credit dedikind for originating the definition of an algebraic ring. he also is responsible for giving one of the two conventional definitions of the real numbers in terms of the rational numbers, which really does solemnize their marriage.

Show thread

the bridging of this conceptual gulf had what seem to me to be two vital steps. one is the development of algebraic geometry, the critical insight here being the possibility of a magnitude being a "solution" of a polynomial equation. as far as i know, this was the innovation of abu kamil, an early algebraist in the arabic tradition, though the form of the idea we are most familiar with is the coordinate plane of descartes

Show thread

returning to the body of the matter, this crisis in geometric reasoning needed an entirely new theory of proportion to be developed and integrated into the system of plane geometry. that took time but wasnt a deal breaker. what was a deal breaker is that for the next millennium, more or less, (positive whole) numbers and magnitudes were conceptually different species and, though they had some similar properties, could not be made to reveal important facts about the other

Show thread

as a historical aside, a number of school geometry texts quietly only proved important propositions of the theory of proportional triangles for triangles where the ratio between the sides can be written as one of whole numbers and then proceeded to use them as though they'd been proven for all triangles

Show thread

but the fact of the matter is that for the pythagoreans, this result seemed as devastating as if logic itself had been shown to be faulty. they had built an entire system on representing the relations between magnitudes with relations between (positive whole) numbers and here comes a proof that demonstrates the existence of magnitudes that clearly stand in some fixed relation to one another that categorically cannot be equivalent to a relation between numbers

Show thread

people laugh at how the pythagoreans are said to have murdered the guy who told people about the incommensurability of a square's side and diagonal (read: irrationality of the square root of two) but that's just because we take for granted a tremendous amount of work done on the real number system; i even had to translate the statement itself into that system because i imagine most people have never heard of incomensurables

breaking into the Svalbard seed vault to make a true everything bagel

venom reboot but it's a venom/five deadly venoms crossover

leverage is a fun show and has some quite good episodes but it is five seasons long and the characters get approximately five episodes worth of development between them over its run

i feel compelled to state that i will never fucking do this. you cannot make me.

Show thread

getting really into historical dialectics but not in the cool way just doing a fucking deep dive into Old Hegelianism

great man theory of history more like great shit theory of history

I believe in the Dwarf Fortress system of governance: He governs best whose room has a waterfall installed in it and whose drainage system was installed by literally the closest physical person to the room at the time it was requested, skill be damned.

roleplaying king arthur by finding anyone who claims to be "anglo-saxon" and kicking the shit out of them

recoiling in horror when my genealogy reveals one of my ancestors to have come from britain, relaxing only slightly when i learn that he was a scott

Show thread
Show more
monads.online

monads.online is a community for goth nerds, aka people who are interested in the intersections of math, art, programming, philosophy, and related topics. this does not include your techbro ass. we also enjoy a healthy amount of shitposting. if you are a techno-materialist, technocrat, or some flavor of capitalist, don't even bother applying. if you are interested in an account please fill out an application, detailing why you are interested in joining, what you have to bring to the community, and your prior, if any, accounts on the fediverse.