simone de beauvoir dumpstered biological essentialism by pointing out that biological facts dont exist in a vacuum but are encased in cultural valuation of those facts
e.g. if it is a biological fact that men are on average and on the whole physically stronger than women, this fact would not have any bearing on the treatment of women in a society that did not value the ability to physically dominate.
@dankwraith I love her so much
@dankwraith Simone "we live in a society" beauvoir
@dankwraith this sounds like something i actually wanna read now
@cerret de beauvoir was a philosophical heavyweight and an incredible writer and should probably be given most of the credit for modern existentialism but she wasnt, for Some Reason. i wonder what that Reason could possibly be
@dankwraith hmmmmm. what books would you recommend, or if you recommend all of them, what order should i go in
@cerret if youre primarily interested in existentialism, The Ethics of Ambiguity. it mostly deals with the dilemma of radical freedom vs the conditions of circumstance which is uhhh pretty fucking relevant today imo.
if its feminist theory you want, read The Second Sex. she was one of the (if not the first) first writers to articulate the distinction between gender and sex. "One is not born, but becomes a woman."
@polymerwitch and people say philosophy doesnt matter
@dankwraith The 'biological fact' crap is some repackaged naturalistic fallacy crap.
"Biological essentialism" got thrown out the window as soon as we manufactured tools, planted crops, and domesticated animals.
@Tau_Leonis it was probably out the window way before that because its a fake idea
I know it just frustrates me when someone tries to make an argument about how "we as humans should be x because our biology says so" when they are sitting in front of a computer, with air conditioning, and wearing clothing made of synthetic fibers.
monads.online is one server in the network